This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Revisiting RIPE Policy Proposal 2007-01
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revisiting RIPE Policy Proposal 2007-01
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revisiting RIPE Policy Proposal 2007-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
michael.dillon at bt.com
michael.dillon at bt.com
Thu Dec 4 16:39:41 CET 2008
> (Oh, btw, maybe I should point out that you are also "part of > RIPE", I don't chair any WGs. > So what is your point?) Hank said that he did not get any formal notice that the fee changes would be voted on at the meeting. Hank did not complain about any mailing lists. Hank did not complain about any working groups. Hank did complain that the people in the RIPE NCC, who are responsible for organizing the members meeting, made some mistakes. Mistakes happen, but in order to fix them we need to understand exactly what it was that did happen and why it happened that way. The notices to the RIPE announcement list are irrelevant in this case. --Michael Dillon
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revisiting RIPE Policy Proposal 2007-01
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revisiting RIPE Policy Proposal 2007-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]