This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Revisiting RIPE Policy Proposal 2007-01
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revisiting RIPE Policy Proposal 2007-01
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revisiting RIPE Policy Proposal 2007-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hank Nussbacher
hank at efes.iucc.ac.il
Thu Dec 4 13:29:40 CET 2008
At 12:37 PM 04-12-08 +0100, you wrote: >Every RIPE member receives the invitations to the AGM, and the invitation >contained the draft of the to-be-installed charging scheme. It was sent >out well in advance, and there is an option to give proxy votes to other >LIRs if you can't attend yourself. I am also a LIR contact for il.iucc and il.isoc and both did not receive an invitation and I did not see any drafts as discussed. Can you find out to which email address they sent those docs for il.iucc and il.isoc? -Hank >The majority of the LIRs that attended the meeting (or sent proxy votes) >voted for the acceptance of the new charging scheme. > >Gert Doering > -- APWG chair
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revisiting RIPE Policy Proposal 2007-01
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revisiting RIPE Policy Proposal 2007-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]