This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] new policy idea for PA allocations
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] new policy idea for PA allocations
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] new policy idea for PA allocations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Thu Aug 7 10:34:20 CEST 2008
Hi Remco,
On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 11:44:56PM +0200, Remco van Mook wrote:
> What I would suggest is that we set into policy that the RIR, in cases
> like this, allocates a single best-fit routable block of IPv4 space. So,
> if the request is for a /12 and the biggest block the RIR has left is a
> /14, you get a /14.
I can see the rationale, and I also think that it makes sense to do it
that way, operationally.
I'm not sure whether this is something the APWG can/should decide - it's
borderland between "policy" and "procedure". We do policy, the NCC does
procedure...
"Feedback, please!" :)
Gert Doering
-- APWG chair
--
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 128645
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] new policy idea for PA allocations
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] new policy idea for PA allocations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]