This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2008-02 Review Period extended until 16 May 2008 (Assigning IPv6 PA to Every LIR)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-02 Review Period extended until 16 May 2008 (Assigning IPv6 PA to Every LIR)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-08 Review Period extended until 28 May 2008 (Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tim Chown
tjc at ecs.soton.ac.uk
Mon Apr 28 15:38:37 CEST 2008
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 10:28:39PM +0900, Randy Bush wrote: > > In the strive for balanced and fair policies, this would need to include > > that all existing IPv6 allocation holders get a packet of Smarties as well. > > this is back asswards. everyone who buys a packet of smarties should be > given a /32 Do we really need to allocate a /37 per smartie? But in all seriousness, I don't like this proposal as it stands. -- Tim
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-02 Review Period extended until 16 May 2008 (Assigning IPv6 PA to Every LIR)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-08 Review Period extended until 28 May 2008 (Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]