[address-policy-wg] 2007-01 Last Call for Comments (Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC)

Le mercredi 09 avril 2008 à 15:22 +0300, Max Tulyev a écrit :
> Sure, dealing with domains is like IP networks.
> 
> But unlike domains, PI IP networks is not billed yearly (yet).
> 
> May be we should return back old charging scheme when PI is billed
> yearly to LIRs? This will enforce return unused space, make contracts
> between LIRs and end-users, and so on just *automagically* ;)
> 


yes, all internet ressource with no EXECPTION will be bill and like this
somebody grasp european court for monopolistik position... ;)


> frederic at placenet.org wrote:
> >> Frederic,
> >>
> >> current system is NOT working well.
> >>
> >> Just because we can't trace dead companies and dead assignments and
> >> reuse it. In 1-2 years all unused space will be assigned.
> >>
> > 
> > I suppose all (dead-compagny) block has an ripe datatabse record ?
> > 
> > can use the same way that a drop domain name ?
> > 
> > 
> >> But if even that policy will be implemented - how we can enforce it? How
> >> can we revoke that space if need?
> >>
> > 
> > I think that domain name way is interesting to implement ?
> > 
> > before to be a contractual document, is a moral contract.
> > 
> > bst regards.
> > Frederic
> > 
> >> Frederic wrote:
> >>> We support if:
> >>> No Fees is required for this contractual relationship.
> >>> and this contractual relation ship do not exist between and user and one
> >>> LIR.
> >>>
> >>> else
> >>> we do not support, today system works well.
> >>
> >> --
> >> WBR,
> >> Max Tulyev (MT6561-RIPE, 2:463/253 at FIDO)
> >>
> > 
> > 
> 
>