This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] proposal about 2007-1
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] proposal about 2007-1
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] proposal about 2007-1
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Frederic
frederic at placenet.org
Wed Apr 9 12:03:20 CEST 2008
> > - changing "must" to "may" means no change from the current position > that change all, because the holder can have choice. if you don't have contract or break it for any reason : all your internet ressource are keep back. It's OK for PA : is it the main stream of the internet. but we do not want for PI. > Your argument appears to be "I just don't want to have to pay for address > space", and nothing more. This is neither a proper argument nor a > sustainable position. > No i do not say i do not want PAY : this is WRONG. i say we want to have choice for some internet ressource. > As the proposer of this policy change, I don't believe that you have > provided any substantial justification for your opinions. > > If you feel strongly about this, please feel free to either provide > credible justification or else submit an alternative policy proposal. > > we think that credible to fight for a little space of freedom and it is really a question of freedom. bst regards Frederic > Nick Hilliard
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] proposal about 2007-1
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] proposal about 2007-1
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]