This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2007-01 Last Call for Comments(Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-01 Last Call for Comments(Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-01 Last Call for Comments(Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Frederic
frederic at placenet.org
Tue Apr 8 17:16:14 CEST 2008
Le mardi 08 avril 2008 à 17:01 +0200, Sander Steffann a écrit : > Hi Frederic, > > >> > PI holders must maintain an up to date e-mail address with the RIPE > >> > NCC. If they do not, the PI space will be returned to the unused > >> > pool. > >> > >> How do you know if it's up to date - or even listened to? Best way is a > >> contract that says they pay a sum yearly. If the cheque doesn't arrive, > >> or > >> bounces, you take the space back. A small sum like €100/year would > >> suffice. > > > > i will give you 10000 bucks and during 100 years it will not what your > > problem, what the block became. > > It still remains a problem. This proposal is not about the money. It is > about responsible stewardship of internet resources. The way provider > independent resources are handled now it is impossible to follow what is > happening to those resources. Resources that are not in use anymore are lost > because there is no way to check this, while other organisations might need > those resources. > > Policy proposal 2007-01 was introduced to solve this problem. With a > contract between an LIR (or RIPE NCC) and the end user, we can follow the > resource. We could check if it is still in use, if the usage still complies > with the policies, etc. > i do not talk of money specialy. i talk about MUST contract, i propose MAY contract. to find what become the ressource, i propose a procedure like domain. because today with PI-IPV4 , is it possible to do not have contract. this possibility is a little windows of freedom, we ask to not close it. bst regards. Frederic > - Sander >
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-01 Last Call for Comments(Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-01 Last Call for Comments(Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]