This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Policy proposal 2007-01, "Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC"
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal 2007-01, "Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal 2007-01, "Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Andy Davidson
andy at nosignal.org
Tue Apr 8 15:58:46 CEST 2008
On 8 Apr 2008, at 14:53, Axel Pawlik wrote: > Misunderstanding? > End users who establish a relationship with an LIR will not have to > become RIPE NCC members. One contract should be enough :-) Sorry, misunderstanding yes - end sites who do not send their request through an LIR will need to become members. best wishes andy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal 2007-01, "Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal 2007-01, "Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]