This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Policy proposal 2007-01, "Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC"
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal 2007-01, "Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal 2007-01, "Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Andy Davidson
andy at nosignal.org
Tue Apr 8 11:19:48 CEST 2008
Hi, On 8 Apr 2008, at 03:18, Axel Pawlik wrote: > The Executive Board also understands that the proposal introduces > the option for those End Users who cannot form a contract with a > "Sponsoring LIR" to form a contract directly with the RIPE NCC. Thanks for a clear direction/opinion. Please can you identify such an occasion when you think the above may apply ? > In this case the End User will be required to set up an LIR and > become a RIPE NCC member. Based on Axel's comments that End Site -> LIR -> RIR will still be the encouraged application route, and that end sites will need to join the RIPE NCC in order to apply for resources, I support 2007-01. Best wishes Andy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal 2007-01, "Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal 2007-01, "Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]