This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-04 Proposal Accepted (IANA Policy for Allocation of ASN Blocks to RIRs)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Iljitsch van Beijnum
iljitsch at muada.com
Sat Sep 1 01:05:36 CEST 2007
On 31-aug-2007, at 17:31, <michael.dillon at bt.com> <michael.dillon at bt.com> wrote: > I still have not seen > any clear indication that there is a negative technical impact of > assigning a /56 per home. Then you haven't been paying attention, I've been saying /56 is the wrong size for some time now. > To date, the only clear technical issue I have > seen mentioned for subnet prefixes longer than /48 is that if they are > not on a 4-bit hex nibble boundary, it makes IPv6 PTR delegation more > complex. Then you have to delegate 2, 4 or 8 zones rather than 1, big deal.
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-04 Proposal Accepted (IANA Policy for Allocation of ASN Blocks to RIRs)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]