This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ppml] [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal - Cooperative distribution of the end of the IPv4 free pool.
- Previous message (by thread): [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal - Cooperative distribution of the end of the IPv4 free pool.
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal - Cooperative distribution of the end of the IPv4 free pool.
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
michael.dillon at bt.com
michael.dillon at bt.com
Wed Oct 31 17:20:09 CET 2007
> > We should discard all the other silly end-game proposals > and do some > > serious work on making a workable variation of this one. > > > I would point out that this policy applies *after* the IANA > reserve has been allocated. > > The other policies under discussion apply *before* the > reserve has run out, and concern when and how the final IANA > blocks are allocated to RIRs. > > As such, the two kinds of proposals are orthogonal. Exactly! The policies that apply before the IANA reserve has run out, are silly. This policy, which applies after the IANA reserve has run out, makes some sense and does result in a soft landing. > And, in fact, if both kinds are implemented, the benefit is > greater than if only one or the other were implemented. I disagree. And if Tony Hain's policy were to be implemented, then everything before that is basically meaningless. --Michael Dillon
- Previous message (by thread): [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal - Cooperative distribution of the end of the IPv4 free pool.
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal - Cooperative distribution of the end of the IPv4 free pool.
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]