This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2007-08 New Policy Proposal (Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-08 New Policy Proposal (Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-08 New Policy Proposal (Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
jordi.palet at consulintel.es
Mon Oct 29 19:16:17 CET 2007
Hi Mat, I guess it will be clear when the audio/video is available. I explained in my presentation that this is our own network. We have several services which are dual-stack, but my view is that most of the traffic is peer to peer traffic that is being "attracted" to our network because we offer an open public 6to4 and Teredo relay, in addition to the tunnel broker. This may sound as a biased measurement, but actually I don't think so. If we don't have those relays running, this peer-to-peer traffic will be going thru other relays, right ? So unless there is no any relay ... it means that it is logic to assume that the global traffic may become close to those figures, and I guess this will be more true in the next few months, as more and more folks use Vista (and other IPv6 enabled OSs) which automatically use transition mechanisms, and as much more applications take advantage of that. My intend to confirm this, is to decide how to distribute this measurement tool to several ISPs in each region, and then have a regional and global picture of what is actually happening, in such way that we can extrapolate overall IPv6 traffic. As we are measuring transition and I don't expect that the native one will grow too much unless many ISPs start offering dual stack in the access, it is not required that those ISPs being measured have native support at all. Of course, I don't expect that they will have so much transition traffic unless they offer also 6to4 and Teredo relays, however my guess, is that they will be still having more than what they actually though. Regards, Jordi > De: <matthew.ford at bt.com> > Responder a: <address-policy-wg-admin at ripe.net> > Fecha: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 17:55:39 -0000 > Para: <jordi.palet at consulintel.es> > CC: <address-policy-wg at ripe.net> > Conversación: [address-policy-wg] 2007-08 New Policy Proposal (Enabling > Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources) > Asunto: RE: [address-policy-wg] 2007-08 New Policy Proposal (Enabling Methods > for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources) > > Hi Jordi, > >> Here is my talk in the last meeting plenary with the >> traffic stats ... >> http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-55/presentation > s/palet-v6.pdf > > Those slides don't mention what network the stats refer to. Care to > share? > > > Cheers, > Mat > > ********************************************** The IPv6 Portal: http://www.ipv6tf.org Bye 6Bone. Hi, IPv6 ! http://www.ipv6day.org This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-08 New Policy Proposal (Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-08 New Policy Proposal (Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]