[ipv6-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] DRAFT: RIPE Community Resolution on IPv4 Depletion and Deployment of IPv6

I think it may be better one additional paragraph asking the end users to
*request* IPv6 transition or native services to their ISPs and look for an
alternative ISP when their actual one is not willing to offer the service.

Which this, I'm not asking the ISPs to do native overnight, I know this is
not reasonable, but deploying 6to4 and Teredo relays for their users is
simple and inexpensive solution and a very good think for both reducing the
unnecessary upstream traffic and lowering the RTT when using those
transition mechanisms. There is no excuse for an ISP not doing so already
and I'm happy to offer my time if somebody don't have the knowledge about
how to do so.

Regards,
Jordi




> De: Florian Weimer <fw at deneb.enyo.de>
> Responder a: <ipv6-wg-admin at ripe.net>
> Fecha: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 10:57:34 +0200
> Para: Gert Doering <gert at space.net>
> CC: <address-policy-wg at ripe.net>, <ipv6-wg at ripe.net>
> Asunto: [ipv6-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] DRAFT: RIPE Community Resolution on
> IPv4 Depletion and Deployment of IPv6
> 
> * Gert Doering:
> 
>> 2) We urge network operators and Internet Service Providers
>> (ISPs) to deploy IPv6 across their networks as soon as possible.
>> This deployment must include providing IPv6 access to End Users
>> and ensuring services are accessible by IPv6.
> 
> Shouldn't this paragraph target RIPE members specifically? Or, put
> differently, why are end users and software vendors excluded?
> 




**********************************************
The IPv6 Portal: http://www.ipv6tf.org

Bye 6Bone. Hi, IPv6 !
http://www.ipv6day.org

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.