This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] DRAFT: RIPE Community Resolution on IPv4 Depletion and Deployment of IPv6
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] DRAFT: RIPE Community Resolution on IPv4 Depletion and Deployment of IPv6
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] DRAFT: RIPE Community Resolution on IPv4 Depletion and Deployment of IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Patrick Vande Walle
patrick at vande-walle.eu
Thu Oct 18 11:26:09 CEST 2007
Florian Weimer wrote: > * Gert Doering: > >> 2) We urge network operators and Internet Service Providers >> (ISPs) to deploy IPv6 across their networks as soon as possible. >> This deployment must include providing IPv6 access to End Users >> and ensuring services are accessible by IPv6. >> > > Shouldn't this paragraph target RIPE members specifically? Or, put > differently, why are end users and software vendors excluded? > Speaking as an end user, which probably does not qualify me as being part of the "RIPE Community": Agree with Florian's comments, and I would add hardware vendors to the list. As long as there are no commodity CPEs supporting IPv6, there is no incentive for ISPs to deploy IPv6 to their end users, especially those targetting the home users. -- Patrick Vande Walle
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] DRAFT: RIPE Community Resolution on IPv4 Depletion and Deployment of IPv6
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] DRAFT: RIPE Community Resolution on IPv4 Depletion and Deployment of IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]