[address-policy-wg] 2007-08 New Policy Proposal (Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)

Max and all,

  why can't it be enforced now?  Why can these unused IP's
be reclimed or at least parto of them?

-----Original Message-----
>From: Max Tulyev <president at ukraine.su>
>Sent: Nov 3, 2007 4:40 PM
>To: address-policy-wg at ripe.net
>Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2007-08 New Policy Proposal (Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
>
>Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
>>> Leo has already proved that a (fairly simple) reclamation job takes a
>>> lot of time and resource. This is for a /8 that no one much wanted and
>>> no one much used.
>> 
>> Was that the 14/8 thing? Only 129 individual addresses out of 16777216
>> where used. Maybe just reclaiming the other 16777087 would have been
>> more efficient.
>
>May be. But sorry, you can't enforce it now. You even have no time to
>make an implemented in the real life policy that can reclaim any block
>before free IP space will be finished.
>
>So, we have to live with market. Not only because of it.  The only we
>can do is to make that market white and clear.
>
>-- 
>WBR,
>Max Tulyev (MT6561-RIPE, 2:463/253 at FIDO)
>
'Regards,
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 277k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
   Abraham Lincoln

"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very
often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability
depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of
Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1 at ix.netcom.com