This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] suggesting medium/big customers to become lirs is a good or a bad idea?
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] suggesting medium/big customers to become lirs is a good or a bad idea?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] suggesting medium/big customers to become lirs is a good or a bad idea?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Max Tulyev
president at ukraine.su
Wed Mar 21 10:06:11 CET 2007
Jørgen Hovland wrote: > Ask ripe for a new /22. Give it to the customer. The customer can take it over if they become a LIR later. You can multihome your customer as long as they are multihomed within your network. If you do that, make sure you don't put both their links/routers in the same maintenance window. You can ask RIPE for a new PA only when you have less than 80% of your PA unassigned. Maybe you are talking about /22 PI? -- WBR, Max Tulyev (MT6561-RIPE, 2:463/253 at FIDO)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] suggesting medium/big customers to become lirs is a good or a bad idea?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] suggesting medium/big customers to become lirs is a good or a bad idea?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]