This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] suggesting medium/big customers to become lirs is a good or a bad idea?
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-06 Proposal Accepted (IPv4 Maximum Allocation Period)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] suggesting medium/big customers to become lirs is a good or a bad idea?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tiberiu Ungureanu
tiberiu.ungureanu at ines.ro
Wed Mar 21 01:50:47 CET 2007
hello in the past week, at the ISP i work for i received 2 requests for /22 each from customers that provide broadband services to end-users. i personally feel like this type of customers that have needs for such big chunks of ip space should be encouraged to become lirs, because * knowing their type of business it is very likely that they will request at least another /22 in about 1 year (or even less). * it is likely that they would want to be multihomed in the future, and it will be painful for them to renumber (well, if they do their homework will not be so painful, but it's a job they can avoid doing). anyway, at that point in time it is likely they will NEED to become lirs. * lirs pay money to ripe. the more payers, the more likely that the anual fees will be lower for everyone, or if they stay the same the more money RIPE-NCC will have to fund projects that will make our life easier. anyone else feels the same? should i go ahead and try to talk my management into talking them into becoming lirs? or do i just need a cup of coffee and/or more sleep? /t -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20070320/c729b83a/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-06 Proposal Accepted (IPv4 Maximum Allocation Period)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] suggesting medium/big customers to become lirs is a good or a bad idea?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]