This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Policy Proposal 2006-02 (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy Proposal 2006-02 (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-06 Proposal Accepted (IPv4 Maximum Allocation Period)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at inex.ie
Sun Mar 18 23:28:17 CET 2007
> Ever heard of the magical words "Traffic Engineering"? As that is the > cause of lots of /24s being announced, not because so many people have > their small multihomed blocks. <offtopic> In this case, I meant no good reason due to address space assignment constraints. Yes, traffic engineering issues will always exist, just as no-export does. </offtopic> Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy Proposal 2006-02 (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-06 Proposal Accepted (IPv4 Maximum Allocation Period)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]