This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/

[address-policy-wg] Comments on proposed IPv6 Initial Allocation criteria

Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Comments on proposed IPv6 Initial Allocation criteria

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Jerzy Pawlus Jerzy.Pawlus at cyf-kr.edu.pl
Tue Mar 6 10:25:59 CET 2007

Hi,

The move towards removal of 200 assignments is a good one. 
However there is one thing which bothers me. If I read the 5.1.1.
correctly the LIR must advertise the allocated block as a single prefix.
So any LIR, unless it is a big one, will be limited to only one
routing policy. But there are LIRs which hold more than one AS number
and they will be left with nothing to advertise under the second
and subsequent AS numbers.

So I would propose either to remove this limitation or allow more than
one /32 allocation per LIR with more than one AS number.

Regards,

Jurek

Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Comments on proposed IPv6 Initial Allocation criteria

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ address-policy-wg Archives ]