This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Re: [GLOBAL-V6] [ppml] How to get a IPv6 /32 the cheap way: go to AFRINIC
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [GLOBAL-V6] [ppml] How to get a IPv6 /32 the cheap way: go to AFRINIC
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: [afripv6-discuss] Re: [GLOBAL-V6] [ppml] How to get a IPv6 /32 the cheap way: go to AFRINIC
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
David Conrad
david.conrad at icann.org
Thu Jun 28 15:36:44 CEST 2007
On Jun 28, 2007, at 7:31 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 12:45:05PM -0400, > David Conrad <david.conrad at icann.org> wrote > a message of 12 lines which said: >> To state the obvious: there are the same number of /32s in IPv4 >> space as in IPv6 space. > In mathematics, yes, not in actual networks, because of RFC 1715 :-) I'm not sure the context of the smiley here, but just to be clear: the H ratio is irrelevant. There really are the same number of /32s in IPv4 space as there are in IPv6. Further, as we're talking about PI allocations, there is no hierarchy so the H ratio doesn't apply. The fact that an IPv4 /32 can address 1 interface (or, with NAT, more) and IPv6 can address "a few" more doesn't really matter. Rgds, -drc
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [GLOBAL-V6] [ppml] How to get a IPv6 /32 the cheap way: go to AFRINIC
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: [afripv6-discuss] Re: [GLOBAL-V6] [ppml] How to get a IPv6 /32 the cheap way: go to AFRINIC
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]