This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Re: [GLOBAL-V6] Critical or not and at what size (Was: How to get a IPv6 /32 the cheap way: go to AFRINIC)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Critical or not and at what size (Was: How to get a IPv6 /32 the cheap way: go to AFRINIC)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re : [ppml] on PPML? - was Re: How to get ...
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Kosuke Ito
kosuke at bugest.net
Wed Jun 27 23:31:46 CEST 2007
Hi Jeroen, If you have an objection to the current policy, please raise up the counter-proposal to amend the current policy in your region or the other. I am not agueing here if RIR is critical or not. I am just pointing out what the current policy says. I know what you like to say. best regards, Kosuke Jeroen Massar wrote: > Kosuke Ito wrote: > >>Please read carefully about the section of Critical Infrastructure. >> >>AfriNIC is eligible to have a /32 by the policy. > > > How exactly is a RIR more "Critical" to the Internet than Google, > YouTube, MySpace or whatever site somebody uses daily? > > I understand if one would state "A RIR is critical as it provides > service X", but then the RIR itself is not the critical infra, it is > that service. RIPE itself doesn't have a /32 nor a /48, they are using a > /48 that they have from an ISP out of PA space. K.ROOT *does* fall under > critical infra though, and that has, according to that policy a prefix. > > If one states "but they have a DNS server", then how does that make my > DNS server not critical? Especially a DNS server by for instance Akamai > powering hunderds of well used domains? > > [..APNIC policy..] > >>The maximum assignment made under these terms is /32 per operator. > > > And this is the important portion of that part: "The maximum". > That doesn't mean that if you can't justify it that you per default > should be getting a /32. The default should be a /48, and more if one > can justify it. > > Greets, > Jeroen > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > global-v6 mailing list > global-v6 at lists.apnic.net > http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/global-v6 -- ***************IPv6 Internet Wonderland!****************** Kosuke Ito Master Planning and Steering Gr., IPv6 Prom. Council of JP New Business Office/President Office, IRI Ubiteq, Inc. (Visiting Researcher, SFC Lab. KEIO University) Tel:+81-3-3344-7511 Fax:+81-3-3344-7522 Cell:+81-90-9826-4220 mailto: kosuke[at]v6pc.jp http://www.v6pc.jp/ mailto: k-ito[at]ubiteq.co.jp Lifetime e-mail: kosuke[at]stanfordalumni.org
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Critical or not and at what size (Was: How to get a IPv6 /32 the cheap way: go to AFRINIC)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re : [ppml] on PPML? - was Re: How to get ...
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]