[address-policy-wg] Re: [GLOBAL-V6] How to get a IPv6 /32 the cheap way: go to AFRINIC

Please read carefully about the section of Critical Infrastructure.

AfriNIC is eligible to have a /32 by the policy.

FYI: in the APNIC case which is similar to other region more
or less, their policy says,

---------------------
Critical infrastructure
The following critical infrastructure networks, if operating in the Asia 
Pacific region, are eligible to receive a portable assignment:

root domain name system (DNS) server;
global top level domain (gTLD) nameservers;
country code TLD (ccTLDs) nameservers;
IANA;
Regional Internet Registry (RIRs); and
National Internet Registry (NIRs).
Assignments to critical infrastructure are available only to the actual 
operators of the network infrastructure performing such functions. 
Registrar organisations which do not actually host the network housing 
the registry infrastructure, will not be eligible for an assignment 
under this policy.

The maximum assignment made under these terms is /32 per operator.

----------------------------

For IXs, there is another space reserved to allocate a /48 each IX
for their need of globally independent but not routable.

It is a good timing to learn about the allocation policy, and
if there is something outdated, let's review and renew that point.

Best regards,

Kosuke


Jeroen Massar wrote:

> [*full rant mode*]
> 
> My eye just fell on a very strange new allocation, apparently made under some
> new rules in the AFRINIC region which seem to be very wasteful and very out of
> sync with the rest of the world who are at least thinking a bit about address
> conservation instead of just blowing address space like there is no tomorrow:
> 
> http://www.afrinic.net/docs/policies/afpol-v6200407-000.htm#5 details:
> 8<--------------
> 5.1.1. Initial allocation criteria
> To qualify for an initial allocation of IPv6 address space, an organization must:
> a) be an LIR;
> b) not be an end site;
> c) show a detailed plan to provide IPv6 connectivity to organizations in the
> AfriNIC region.
> d) show a reasonable plan for making /48 IPv6 assignments to end sites in the
> AfriNIC region within twelve months. The LIR should also plan to announce the
> allocation as a single aggregated block in the inter-domain routing system
> within twelve months.
> 
> 5.1.2. Initial allocation size
> 
> Organizations that meet the initial allocation criteria are eligible to
> receive a minimum allocation of /32.
> ---------------------------------------------->8
> 
> Wow, so you make a new 'company' in 911 land and say "I am going to allocate a
> single /48" and you get a FULL /32 even when you will never ever ever use it
> or even are going to think about using it?
> 
> The first "organization" which is using this to waste space seems to be:
> 
> inet6num:       2001:42d0::/32
> netname:        AfriNIC-IPv6-1
> descr:          AfriNIC
> descr:          RIR
> country:        MU
> 
> Gee, the RIR itself. How many people are using the AFRINIC network? 10-50? Are
> they really *ever* going to need more than a /48? Are they ever going to have
> a need for 65536 of those /48's?
> 
> Really this is just a waste of address space. Yes there is "enough", but being
> sooo obviously wasteful just to be able to have a nice slot in the routing
> tables is a bit over done.
> 
> 
> I hope that the other regions take this in mind too when (re)considering their
>  address policies.
> 
> Giving out /48's or even a /40 to an organization that is in-effect an
> end-site I can understand, especially when they can justify the need for that
> amount of address space. But giving /32's to every single endsite that simply
> asks for it is very very very far fetched. They will not even ever fill up a
> /40 of address space even if they would have two sites (read: offices) in
> every country in Africa, let alone 65536 sites. Such a waste.
> 
> Funnily later in the above document they point to HD ratios. What point is
> that when the waste is already happened?
> 
> 
> RIR's should be giving out address space based on "need" and that need must
> justified, giving out /32's as "those fit in the routing slots" is a really
> really bad idea.
> 
> In short: if you want a nice /32 without issues: setup a small shop in Africa
> and presto!
> 
> Greets,
>  Jeroen
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> global-v6 mailing list
> global-v6 at lists.apnic.net
> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/global-v6

-- 
***************IPv6 Internet Wonderland!******************
Kosuke Ito
Master Planning and Steering Gr., IPv6 Prom. Council of JP
New Business Office/President Office, IRI Ubiteq, Inc.
(Visiting Researcher, SFC Lab. KEIO University)
Tel:+81-3-3344-7511  Fax:+81-3-3344-7522
Cell:+81-90-9826-4220
mailto: kosuke[at]v6pc.jp   http://www.v6pc.jp/
mailto: k-ito[at]ubiteq.co.jp
Lifetime e-mail: kosuke[at]stanfordalumni.org