This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] PI (was: Revising Centrally Assigned ULA draft)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ppml] Revising Centrally Assigned ULA draft
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] PI (was: Revising Centrally Assigned ULA draft)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Andy Davidson
andy at nosignal.org
Mon Jun 18 18:13:39 CEST 2007
On 18 Jun 2007, at 17:09, Gert Doering wrote: > There is quite a number of people out there that are quite sceptic > about PI space - and really do not want to make access to PI space > easy and convenient. Consider me one of those - globally routed PI > space puts burden on everybody else, so this should be well- > considered, and putting some hurdles in people's way might make > them reconsider whether they really want PI or not. What, you'd rather people deagg their PA in order to let their customers multi-home ? > Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 113403 ... because it doesn't look like you prefer that at all ....
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ppml] Revising Centrally Assigned ULA draft
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] PI (was: Revising Centrally Assigned ULA draft)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]