This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Re: [ppml] Revising Centrally Assigned ULA draft
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ppml] Revising Centrally Assigned ULA draft
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ppml] Revising Centrally Assigned ULA draft
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Roger Jorgensen
rogerj at jorgensen.no
Sat Jun 16 17:24:08 CEST 2007
On Sat, 16 Jun 2007, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote: > Anyway is something that could be debated when ULA-C is available :-) if ULA-C is available... why are you so sure it will go through and be accepted? not many have supported it so far. Some of those in favour have changed view, me included. -- ------------------------------ Roger Jorgensen | - ROJO9-RIPE - RJ85P-NORID roger at jorgensen.no | - IPv6 is The Key! -------------------------------------------------------
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ppml] Revising Centrally Assigned ULA draft
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ppml] Revising Centrally Assigned ULA draft
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]