This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] PI for Not-DNS Anycast.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] PI for Not-DNS Anycast.
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] PI for Not-DNS Anycast.
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Thu Jun 14 15:58:37 CEST 2007
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 08:08:49AM +0100, Andy Davidson wrote:
> I'm simply suggesting that there's a hole in current policy (or is
> there ? Does this resource requirement get covered by 'PI needed to
> multihome'), that we can look to fill with this real world example.
The current policy doesn't permit assignment of "PI for generic anycast"
- mainly because nobody has stood up and said "we plan do to do *this*,
and we plan to do it via anycast, and the current policy doesn't work
for us!" yet.
"Someone might want to use it some day" is *not* a good argument for
making policy.
Gert Doering
-- APWG chair
--
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 113403
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] PI for Not-DNS Anycast.
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] PI for Not-DNS Anycast.
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]