This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2007-05 Discussion Period extended until 9 July 2007 (IPv6 ULA-Central)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-05 Discussion Period extended until 9 July 2007 (IPv6 ULA-Central)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-05 Discussion Period extended until 9 July 2007 (IPv6 ULA-Central)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
michael.dillon at bt.com
michael.dillon at bt.com
Mon Jun 11 11:47:01 CEST 2007
> PDP Number: 2007-05 > IPv6 ULA-Central > > Dear Colleagues > > The Discussion Period for the proposal described in 2007-05 > has been extended until 9 July 2007. It disturbs me to see that RIPE is seriously engaged in discussing the implementation of an addressing proposal that the IETF has already rejected. Anyone who supports this proposal AT THIS TIME, is also attacking the current structure of the Regional Internet Registry system and its relationship to IANA, the IETF and ICANN. This is not the time or the place to be discussing central ULA addresses. If the IETF has rejected the idea in the past, then it is up to people to fix their design and take it back to the IETF forums. Regional Internet Registries should not create policy for numbering resources which have not been created by the IETF or delegated to the RIRs by IANA. --Michael Dillon
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-05 Discussion Period extended until 9 July 2007 (IPv6 ULA-Central)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-05 Discussion Period extended until 9 July 2007 (IPv6 ULA-Central)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]