[ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again

> > Should ULA-C be published in the Whois database? what about reverse DNS
> > for them, should they be delegated or just reply a NXDOMAIN?
>
> let's see.  ula-c should be assigned and tracked by rirs.  they
> should have whois and in-addr.arpa.  do remind me how they
> differ from pi space.  i keep forgetting.

Oh, they differ because they are supposedly "not routeable on the
public big-I Internet" because "they will be filtered away by ISPs".

However, I suspect you are perhaps hinting that when a sufficient
number of organizations have been given ULA-C addresses, the
pressure on ISPs is going to be like "oh, pretty please, for this
amount of $$$, can you please route these ULA-C addresses for me
across your network", and after a while with the sheer meat-
weight of all the sloppily-handed-out ULA-C addresses, we will
have re-created the swamp from IPv4 (192/8)?

Regards,

- Håvard