This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI policy implemented
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI policy implemented
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-02 Proposal Accepted (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
jordi.palet at consulintel.es
Thu Jul 19 10:53:30 CEST 2007
Hi Sascha, I replied to your comments with some new questions, but never saw your response, not sure if I missed something. I'm trying to submit a new version during the next couple of days, so any new inputs are always welcome ! Regards, Jordi > De: Sascha Lenz <slz at baycix.de> > Organización: BayCIX GmbH > Responder a: <address-policy-wg-admin at ripe.net> > Fecha: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 09:04:25 +0200 > Para: Marc van Selm <marc.van.selm at nc3a.nato.int> > CC: <address-policy-wg at ripe.net> > Asunto: Re: [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI policy implemented > > Hi, > > Marc van Selm schrieb: >> I'm wondering. ARIN and AfriNIC assign PI space for end-sites. They both >> do /48 (ARIN also does a /48 as I remember correctly). Isn't the discussion >> in the RIPE area not getting a bit too long and taken over by events. >> >> As an example, NATO can also just as easily apply for space from ARIN >> (although RIPE covers more of NATO's area of operation as it seems). >> Something similar would be true for many International customers interested >> in PI. >> >> Just wondering... Shouldn't we just give up our strong feelings and face the >> fact that other bits of the world have already acted, just do it and >> coordinate a global route filter policy etc so that things actually work? > [...] > > yes, "we" should do that, please send some troops to repacify the enemy > dorkheads, thank you :-) > > </sarcasm> > > A while ago, i made a rather simple suggestion as a reaction to Jordi's > latest incarnation of his PI-policy proposal (which is - sorry- stupid). > The only concerns i've seen about it so far was that one might be a bit > more precise about the wording. > > Since then i haven't seen much activitiy about the proposal anymore. > > I feel the urge to move on here. The PDP is getting really stupid at > this point (>1,5 years?). > If nothing positively happens with 2006-01 soon, i tend to hand in my > own proposal and call for NATO air support :-) > > -- > ======================================================================== > = Sascha Lenz SLZ-RIPE slz at baycix.de = > = Network Operations = > = BayCIX GmbH, Landshut * PGP public Key on demand * = > ======================================================================== > ********************************************** The IPv6 Portal: http://www.ipv6tf.org Bye 6Bone. Hi, IPv6 ! http://www.ipv6day.org This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI policy implemented
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-02 Proposal Accepted (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]