This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Concerns on policy proposal 2005-08
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Concerns on policy proposal 2005-08
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Concerns on policy proposal 2005-08
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Leo Vegoda
leo.vegoda at icann.org
Fri Jan 26 10:29:27 CET 2007
Hi Jordi, On Jan 26, 2007, at 10:04 AM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote: > Hi Leo, > > Yes, good point, that's the idea. Are you trying to limit the commercial freedom of ISPs to offer a range of products based around different sized networks? I remember this issue being discussed in the context of IPv4 when ripe-152, the 'Charging by Local Internet Registries' document was reviewed a couple of years ago. I seem to remember several strong statements against RIR policy regulating business models during that discussion. Is this a discussion you want to re-visit? http://www.ripe.net/ripe/wg/address-policy/r47-minutes.html (Section F) Regards, -- Leo Vegoda IANA Numbers Liaison
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Concerns on policy proposal 2005-08
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Concerns on policy proposal 2005-08
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]