[address-policy-wg] Concerns on policy proposal 2005-08

Jordi,

On Jan 25, 2007, at 4:41 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:

[...]

> 5.4.1. I think is a mistake to change the existing text, but if we  
> decide to
> go for it, I will never suggest a minimum value of /64. End-users  
> need to
> have at least a prefix that allow to have several subnets. My view  
> is still
> that /48 is the right size, but definitively I will accept in the  
> *worst*
> case something such as /56, but never /64 should be suggested as a  
> minimum
> value. I think if we go into this direction, definitively there is  
> a need to
> clearly state that the end-users have the right to request extra  
> size if
> needed, without any additional justification,

When you say that end users should have the right to "request" extra  
space if needed "without any additional justification", do you  
actually mean that end users should have the right to *receive* extra  
space without any additional justification?

Regards,

-- 
Leo Vegoda
IANA Numbers Liaison