This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignment Size)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignment Size)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignment Size)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Wed Feb 14 18:48:11 CET 2007
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 05:41:39PM +0000, Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet wrote:
> - on a more general note, as long as the minimum assignemt size for customers
> receiving PA is raised to /24, too, this proposal is a real incentive to go
> for PI instead of PA.
A "not" is missing somewhere in this sentence, but I think the intended
meaning is clear :)
(not commenting on the policy proposal itself)
Gert Doering
-- APWG chair
--
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 98999
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignment Size)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignment Size)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]