This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] RE: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: [ppml] IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-02 Policy Proposal Withdrawn (Change in IP Assignments for Anycasting DNS Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Noel Chiappa
jnc at mercury.lcs.mit.edu
Mon Aug 27 19:42:04 CEST 2007
> From: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker at verisign.com> > Perhaps you could define the term subnet? "IP subnet", or "subnet" in the more general networking (outside-the-IP-community - the null set these days, I know) sense? For the first, originally, back in the days of class A/B/C "network numbers", it was a chunk of address space smaller than the "network" it was assigned from; it was used to provide addresses for a particular physical network. Now that we have CIDR, it seems to basically just means a chunk of address space assigned to a particular hardware network (the second meaning of "subnet"). For the second, it meant a particular physical network, i.e. the collection of end-stations which could send packets directly to each other without going through a router. This was before bridges, hubs, etc. Goodness knows what it means now! I'd suggest "multicast broadcast domain" as a good modern functional definition. Noel
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: [ppml] IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-02 Policy Proposal Withdrawn (Change in IP Assignments for Anycasting DNS Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]