This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Re: [anti-spam-wg] Fwd: Re: Re: NCC#2007083003 Fwd: DELIVERY FAILURE:
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [anti-spam-wg] Fwd: Re: Re: NCC#2007083003 Fwd: DELIVERY FAILURE:
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [anti-spam-wg] Fwd: Re: Re: NCC#2007083003 Fwd: DELIVERY FAILURE:
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Dave Crocker
dhc at dcrocker.net
Sat Aug 25 14:27:15 CEST 2007
der Mouse wrote: > The real problem is that > ICANN/IANA lets them get away with it, and I see that (that the top of > the governance pyramid does not impose responsibility on those to whom > it delegates authority ... > Any system with mismatches between authority and responsibility grows > abuses, until one of three things happens: The scope of this problem is much larger than ICANN or the Internet. We need to press for the same application of power against communication abusers by the equivalent authorities who assign telephone numbers and postal addresses. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [anti-spam-wg] Fwd: Re: Re: NCC#2007083003 Fwd: DELIVERY FAILURE:
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [anti-spam-wg] Fwd: Re: Re: NCC#2007083003 Fwd: DELIVERY FAILURE:
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]