This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] PI for Not-DNS Anycast.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] PI for Not-DNS Anycast.
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] PI for Not-DNS Anycast.
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mikael Abrahamsson
swmike at swm.pp.se
Wed Aug 8 16:11:40 CEST 2007
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007, Greg L. wrote: > I think that the PI /24 block should be assigned only to UDP related services > as RFC suggests, however, I have yet to see the successful implementation of > TCP data, state... replication in case one router withdraws BGP announcement > of the /24 prefix. As I have stated before, there are TCP based services (IRC) that already today use /24 PIs for anycast. No, they do not handle state. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike at swm.pp.se
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] PI for Not-DNS Anycast.
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] PI for Not-DNS Anycast.
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]