This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] PI for Not-DNS Anycast.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] PI for Not-DNS Anycast.
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] PI for Not-DNS Anycast.
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Greg L.
bgp2 at linuxadmin.org
Wed Aug 8 16:07:36 CEST 2007
> > > and some large LIR's > >Large LIRs probably have a decent network and can do what they want within >their own network. Do you disagree that they should have that advantage? > > Sure it's their advantage... However, I cannot understand .. there are some companies that offer global anycast dns service in USA or ARIN has different rules (they didn't approve /24 for dns anycast back in 2005 I believe)? How these companies can meet 25% initial and 50% utilization in one year for that /24 allocation? Sincerely, Greg
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] PI for Not-DNS Anycast.
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] PI for Not-DNS Anycast.
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]