This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] PI for Not-DNS Anycast.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] PI for Not-DNS Anycast.
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] PI for Not-DNS Anycast.
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Wed Aug 8 14:31:54 CEST 2007
Hi,
just to point something out:
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 03:16:51PM -0700, Greg L. wrote:
> ccTLD service should be NOT the only exception to get /24 PI for anycast
> DNS, the policy should be open for any business entity that can demonstrate
> the need for /24 PI DNS anycast allocation and 2+ disperse locations where
> this prefix is announced.
So far, I have seen *one* entity speak up and say "we want to do DNS anycast,
and we're not a ccTLD operator". So there's certainly not overwhelming
demand (yet?).
Argueing on behalf of not-so-well defined others isn't too helpful in
policy development...
Gert Doering
-- APWG chair
--
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 113403
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] PI for Not-DNS Anycast.
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] PI for Not-DNS Anycast.
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]