[address-policy-wg] PI for Not-DNS Anycast.

I would say IPv4 anycast /24 PI must be allocated for anycasting DNS 
service only. You simply can't add more nameservers if you hit the max limit...


The rules for IPv6 anycast allocations must be not that strict in the 
future... why? The address space will be more than enough, the router HW 
will be more powerful to handle large routing tables ...

Sincerely,
Greg L.



>On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 08:36:06PM -0700, Greg L. wrote:
> > Ps. If Ripe will allow anycast /24 PI allocation for syslog and ddos, and
> > other UDP based services, then expect all free /24 blocks taken in a year
> > or less for sure ;)
>
>So what's your message?  Do you support handing out /24 PI for "these"
>applications, or do you oppose it, due to address space / routing table
>slots usage?
>
>Your e-mail was a bit unclear in that respect...
>
>Gert Doering
>         -- APWG chair
>--
>Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations:  113403
>
>SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
>Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
>D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
>Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444            USt-IdNr.: DE813185279