[address-policy-wg] 2007-02 New Policy Proposal (Change in IP Assignments for Anycasting DNS Policy)

Why does this proposal say it's for DNS only? I guess other anycast protocols aren't important enough?


j


-----Original Message-----
From: address-policy-wg-admin at ripe.net [mailto:address-policy-wg-admin at ripe.net] On Behalf Of Gert Doering
Sent: 25. april 2007 16:52
To: Nick Hilliard
Cc: Gert Doering; address-policy-wg at ripe.net
Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2007-02 New Policy Proposal (Change in IP Assignments for Anycasting DNS Policy)

Hi,

On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 03:44:26PM +0100, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> >Well, yes-and-no.  2007-01 is only IPv6, while [...]
> 2007-01 applies to ipv4, ipv6 and as numbers.

Sorry.  I got all confused with the IPv6 PI proposal (which is 200*6*-01).

However, my primary comment still stands :-) - if we end up having IPv6 PI,
we can do away with most of the special-case IPv6 policies.

Gert Doering
        -- APWG chair
-- 
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations:  113403

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444            USt-IdNr.: DE813185279