This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2006-02 Discussion Period extended until 16 April 2007 (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-02 Discussion Period extended until 16 April 2007 (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-02 Discussion Period extended until 16 April 2007 (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet
Woeber at CC.UniVie.ac.at
Mon Apr 2 13:42:57 CEST 2007
Shane Kerr wrote: > I like the proposed change, as is. So do I, I'd like to state my support for this proposal. This version is pretty clean, consistent and concise, imho. > It seems a good idea to make IPv6 space easier to get. > > Not really related to this specific proposed change, but maybe it is > time to start thinking about making IPv4 space harder to get, too. > > On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 12:26:28PM +0200, Filiz Yilmaz wrote: > >>PDP Number: 2006-02 >>IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy > > >> http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2006-02.html > > > Wilfried.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-02 Discussion Period extended until 16 April 2007 (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-02 Discussion Period extended until 16 April 2007 (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]