[address-policy-wg] Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations (2006-01)

JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:

[ ... ]
> Last, but not least, I also will prefer a "common" policy across the
> different regions, but I think we can't call it "global", because ICANN
> process, and in any case, it may be very difficult to coordinate that if not
> too late and impossible ...

That is actually an issue I'd like to comment on.

Regarding the use of words, what we can *try* to achieve across the regions is
a thing that is called "globally coordinated". The first time we applied that
approach to come up with (almost) identical, or at least very similar, polocies
in all regions was the (dreaded) "200 Customer rule" for IPv6 PA Allocations.

Whether it was wise to work towards such a compromise, which in retrospect left
many in the community unhappy, is a different story...

So - is anyone in a position to summarize for us which regions are doing that
already (ARIN afair, others?) and what the size detais are, or which regions
are working towards such a policy (RIPE obviously is).

Can the NCC help out here?

Wilfried.