This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy (2006-02)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy (2006-02)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy (2006-02)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marc van Selm
marc.van.selm at nc3a.nato.int
Thu Sep 28 12:58:36 CEST 2006
On Wednesday 27 September 2006 12:01, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Same for this one ... Looking for further inputs to this policy proposal.
I fully supported this proposal at it removes some arbitraby and virtually
impossible to verify (for the RIPE-NCC) qualifiers.
Marc
--
-- This mail is personal --
All statements in this mail are made from my own personal
perspective and do not necessarily reflect my employer's
opinions or policies.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy (2006-02)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy (2006-02)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]