[address-policy-wg] Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations (2006-01)

At 10:56 27/09/2006, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>Sorry confused stats. Ignore the previous email ...
>
>As the discussion period for this proposal
>(http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2006-01.html) is almost over, I
>will like to ask for the latest inputs in order to further decide how to
>proceed.
>
>Filiz arranged some stats about the discussion (thanks a lot for that !)
>last July, and afterwards, even if the discussion period has been extended,
>I don't recall having seen new comments.
>
>The stats don't include my own postings:
>
> >>> - there were 9 posts from 8 individuals about it.
> >>>
> >>> - 5 people supported it. 1 of these made some comments though, that he
> >>> prefers a longer prefix than a /32 clearly in his mail.
> >>>
> >>> - 1 person stated he supports "PI" but he is not supporting this proposal.
> >>>
> >>> - 2 people said "No".
>
>So someone else will like to say anything new or clarify their view in favor
>or opposition to the proposal ?

Jordi,

I also support this proposal.

-- Tim