[address-policy-wg] Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations (2006-01)

Hi all,

Sorry confused stats. Ignore the previous email ...

As the discussion period for this proposal
(http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2006-01.html) is almost over, I
will like to ask for the latest inputs in order to further decide how to
proceed.

Filiz arranged some stats about the discussion (thanks a lot for that !)
last July, and afterwards, even if the discussion period has been extended,
I don't recall having seen new comments.

The stats don't include my own postings:

>>> - there were 9 posts from 8 individuals about it.
>>> 
>>> - 5 people supported it. 1 of these made some comments though, that he
>>> prefers a longer prefix than a /32 clearly in his mail.
>>> 
>>> - 1 person stated he supports "PI" but he is not supporting this proposal.
>>> 
>>> - 2 people said "No".

So someone else will like to say anything new or clarify their view in favor
or opposition to the proposal ?

Regards,
Jordi






**********************************************
The IPv6 Portal: http://www.ipv6tf.org

Bye 6Bone. Hi, IPv6 !
http://www.ipv6day.org

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.