[address-policy-wg] 2006-04 Draft Document will be produced (Contact e-mail Address Requirements)

Denis Walker wrote:

[...]
> ... If you feel this
> should have a higher priority then you may raise the issue on the Database
> Working Group or Antispam Working Group or Address Policy Working Group
> mailing lists."

My feeling is that the only appropriate one is the AP-WG - if at all.

Anti-Spam seems to be a niche market, looking at the number of different
abusive behaviour patterns, and DB-WG usually looks at issues regarding
the tools and the registration machinery.

In particular, DB-WG is very reluctant to get drawn into (human) resource
allocation (i.e. money :-) ) discussions...

Wilfried.

PS: I know I am not making new friends with the following text, but still:
Spam is not a network or addressing problem - it is an application and
socio-economic problem. Now shoot - you know where to find me :-)