This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Joao Damas
Joao_Damas at isc.org
Fri Sep 22 10:19:39 CEST 2006
On 21 Sep, 2006, at 15:50, leo vegoda wrote: > Hi Max, > > On 21 Sep 2006, at 7:41GMT+02:00, Max Tulyev wrote: >>> >>> We always 'quarantine' address space when it is returned to us. >>> Allocations from about 65 LIRs have been returned so far this year. >> >> And what will be if some totally mad person will announce that >> space and >> will say "It's mine, not your!!!"? Can RIPE use some (which?) >> force in >> this case? > > The RIPE NCC has no authority over routing decisions taken by > network operators. > Though hopefully it will have public records for ISPs to see who has been assigned the IP block through the established process, right? Joao
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]