This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Florian Weimer
fw at deneb.enyo.de
Thu Sep 21 22:53:29 CEST 2006
* Max Tulyev: > Second, "PI vs LIR" deal. If one real wants own IP/AS, and ready to pay > for it, this one WILL add a prefix to the global routing table, either > he become a LIR or only get PI. BUT. If costs are equal, EVERY manager > (who make final decision for what to pay) will take MORE "something" (IP > addresses in this case) for same (or near) price. Reality check, please. Market prices for PI space (excluding router setup etc.) are quite close to LIR setup fees.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]