This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
leo vegoda
leo at ripe.net
Thu Sep 21 15:28:19 CEST 2006
Hi Per, On 21 Sep 2006, at 4:17GMT+02:00, Per Heldal wrote: [...] > What the immediate upstream may think would be irrelevant. *If* > there is > *ever* consensus within the RIPE community to have the NCC reclaim > blocks, there would have to be mechanisms in place to enforce the > decision. That would most probably involve a quarantine period for > reclaimed prefixes during which transit providers in the region > would be > asked to black-hole the space. We always 'quarantine' address space when it is returned to us. Allocations from about 65 LIRs have been returned so far this year. Regards, -- leo vegoda Registration Services Manager RIPE NCC
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]