This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Max Tulyev
president at ukraine.su
Wed Sep 20 20:32:33 CEST 2006
Gennady Abramov wrote: > On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 06:03:09PM +0000, Max Tulyev wrote: >> Gennady Abramov wrote: >>> And, don't forget that you even can do multihoming without PI address >>> space, by multihoming of PA assigment (if LIR permitted it). >> Multihoming, but not backups. Because of some traffic will flow through >> [aggregated] LIR route if even link with LIR will be damaged. > It is very some traffic. > Some traffic flows on default gateway, even if you have BGP full view on > the router... :) > Normally, longest prefix has highest priority. If your > multihomed prefix doesn't exist in some part of Internet, you may have > troubles with connectivity with this part of Internet, don't looking PA > or PI addresses you uses. > In the case of PA specific, traffic from this part of Internet will flow > to aggregated route, and, if specific route would be found on next hops, > will go to specific route from this next hops. > In the case of PI, traffic will flow to default or will be dropped. > Anyway, if your prefix doesn't routed anywhere, it isn't normal > situation, don't depend of addresses u use. Good only in the theory ;) IRL some "wise" admins filters out more specific if there is less specific (? - as I can understand this). This means some part of Internet will be not accessible if there is no link between you and your LIR. -- WBR, Max Tulyev (MT6561-RIPE, 2:463/253 at FIDO)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]