This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Max Tulyev
president at ukraine.su
Tue Sep 19 20:37:18 CEST 2006
David Conrad wrote:
> Simply, PI to network topological leaves doesn't scale.
I think it is not an argument for PI. You also can't scale PA when it
ends. You only can allocate new one.
It is an argument for thinking before doing. Best way is to set up
period of requesting, i.e. one company can do same kind of requests for
example once in two years. It makes a company think twice about scaling
("do we requesting enough space for our grow?") and about conserving
("we have to pay more for more space").
--
WBR,
Max Tulyev (MT6561-RIPE, 2:463/253 at FIDO)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]