[address-policy-wg] Re:2006-06 New Policy Proposal (IPv4 Maximum Allocation Period)]

Filiz Yilmaz wrote:
 > PDP Number: 2006-06 IPv4 Maximum Allocation Period

The subject of this proposal sounds a *lot* like:

"The maximum period that an IPv4 prefix will be allocated to the LIR"

while instead is meant (what I read from the rest of the text and 
taunted some others with who also read it differently ;) :

"The maximum period over which we will ask the LIR to foresee the future 
developments and requests that it will make"

Thus the subject is sort of misleading, maybe a better naming would be:

"2006-06 Maximum Period used in Determination of New IPv4 Allocations"

but I'll leave the exact wording to be filled in by the rest of the APWG 
members.

One extra note, in case RIPE at a certain point accepts one of the "IPv6 
PI" proposals, then the above might be applicable to those too.

For the rest, the proposal sounds good to me, especially in light of 
making policies more equal globally.

Greets,
  Jeroen


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 311 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20060912/bb322ac7/attachment.sig>